Space art and culture in Brazil: Three years of activities at the National Institute for Space Research (Fabiane M. Borges, September 2022)

Since 2019, Fabiane M. Borges curates a research platform on Art and Space Culture at the Brazilian National Institute for Space Research (INPE). On the occasion of the 73d International Astronautical Congress in Paris, the Space Without Rockets publication and the Global Periphery symposium, she comes back on the last three years of the program.

In the current historical moment we see a resurgence of interest in space as a way to expand the means of production, circulation and terrestrial knowledge. This requires more researchers and specialists committed to represent the regional interests of Latin America and the Global South. In this perspective we present space art and culture as a transdisciplinary field that has the task of awakening creative, imaginative and innovative aspects in the space area and technoscientific development. In industrially precarious countries like Brazil, it is necessary to give strength to inventive skills to innovate the field of space science and achieve new ways to guarantee research, autonomy and sovereignty. It is through the alliance between technosicentific knowledge, economic investment and cultural and social diversity that we can think of sustainable and even more powerful clean technologies. In this perspective, a series of art and space culture activities are being carried out at INPE. This hybrid field can generate news cosmicities, which can transform consumers into actors of technodiversity. We intend to use this series as a platform of reference to create a center of research in space art and culture at the institute. We analyze in this text six space art and culture process we are realizing at INPE 1) the curatorial and conceptual lines applied in the development of space art and culture projects at INPE; 2) the artistic residencies (2019-2022); 3) the ArtSat category (artistic satellites) in the CubeDesign satellite competition (2021); 4) the Workshops of ArtSats (2020/2021); 5) the First Album of Latin American cosmic Sounds (2021); 6) the Plutocracy on Pluto, summer course focused on astropolitics (2022). This text analyzes the methodologies used for the construction of these projects and its general applicability.

Curatorial and conceptual lines applied in the development of art and space culture projects at INPE

We have adopted in the space art and culture activities at INPE, a curatorial line that tries to promote the process of singularization constituted on the basis of critical thinking, decolonial studies and social and techno diversity. In search of building intersections between local knowledge and astropolitical events, we try to associate the terrestrial multiple perspectives to the orbital, solar, interplanetary and cosmic complexity.

Colony

We know that the harmful effects of colonization apply not only to macro-structural political phenomena, but also to subjective and micropolitical phenomena. The emotional and affective repertoires, as well as the linguistic and memorial characteristics of peoples are direct results of their environmental and historical matrices that manifest themselves in unique worldviews and experiences. When these singularities encounter the steamroller of Western colonial history, it is devastated (1). The consequences generated in Latin America in general and in Brazil in particular during the beginning of the colonial period until now are still not properly measured. The compulsory production of homogenization that extends from the colonial period until now, brings as an effect the precariousness of the future, since it does not guarantee a broad spectrum of references for the expansion of our productive intelligences, hindering the variety of research in the field of humanities and technoscience. These productive areas, instead of having broad and unrestricted access to cultural multiplicities, are restricted to monocultural rational models, impoverished by little variation in the senses of rationality, affectivity and experience, because they are based on a colonial, phallocentric, egocentric, capitalized culture, sustained by exploitative modalities, with little emotional amplitude and full of sexist and racial metaphors. In this way, ecological repertoires, world perspectives, emotional nuances, linguistic knowledge, and also technological developments that have not had the opportunity to flourish in the past are lost (yet, perhaps).

Our interest in these debates does not presuppose a return to ancestral primitivism, much less an uncritical adherence to globalism, but is located between (inter) planetary politics and cultural diversity of contemporary Latin America (and global south). We insist on these issues to collaborate in the construction of a future in which these historical injustices are repaired, in which the cultural diversity of the gender, race, and class minorities can be manifested through technological, scientific, theoretical, poetic, artistic artifacts, and so on. Contrary to this movement, we have on the other side the corporate massification system, which through the manipulation of science, technology and the media creates a machine of reproduction of colonial unconsciousness, that transforms the relations between human and nature into a treadmill of exploitation and expropriation, and prevents the autonomy of peoples to assert their own perspective on the world, nature, technology, and the future.

Geopolitical multilateralism

With the current geopolitical analysis, mainly scanned after the events that occurred in February 2022, with the occupation of Ukrainian territories by Russia, which publicly brought to light the need to change the logic of a polarized world to a possible multipolar era, where several nations are deeply thinking about their own sovereignty instead of submitting to a single dominant logic, we can understand more precisely the structure of the hegemonic thought so-called colonial or universalist, and what are the power networks that want to maintain it. The analysis of this geopolitical data allows us to understand more clearly that the projects considered inexorable within the capitalist, militarist machine, producer of the so-called universal subjectivity, are in reality organized by small conglomerates of financial and governmental groups that invest in technoscientific research for the production of their own profits, that with the domination of the media linked to political domination, determine the “scenarios of reality”, from a set of beliefs and values transformed into capital.

Countries like Brazil are bound to this so-called universal standardization, under constant threat of economic sanctions or military attacks by allied countries and corporations that have their own plans for the various “peripheral” regions of the world, the West, South America, Brazil. Local Brazilian industry is becoming precarious, because its “national vocation” is increasingly tied to the export of food and natural resources, because the technological safeguards, the restrictions for scientific production are actually determined from the articulation between corporate elites of the country itself and foreign corporate elites. These programs of economic alliances between national and international elites disregard national development projects because their interest is to generate profit for their own corporations. In other words, in the name of globalization, a universal set of elites is formed whose goal is to generate more profit and not to solve local social problems.

Thinking from localized knowledge (2) and not just accepting the great universalized and homogenized determinants is a way to safeguard the different perspectives that inhabit our planet, which directly interferes in the way we think and produce territory, technology, science, philosophy, art, and other possible or desirable worlds. But the conquest of this autonomy, in the historical references, has so far been achieved through much resistance, war, death, confrontation, genocide and murder, which puts, as a paradoxical effect, the entire arms industry in motion and consequently increases the profits of the war industry itself. It takes a lot of imagination to interrupt this logic.

Astropolitics and space culture hegemony

During the Cold War, in the space race, the world still divided its attention to a bilateral model (Soviet Union and the United States) and watched in this dispute, between state communism versus capitalist liberalism, two very different ways of thinking about the future among the stars. After the US made the first manned moon landings, the USSR continued to invest in the construction of the MIR (the first manned space station put into orbit). During this period, a series of cooperative space projects between the two powers began to take place, but by the end of the 1980s, the USSR began to weaken as a political, economic, and ideological project, and finally the union of Soviet socialist republics collapsed. The American liberal project became the new world empire project, and applied its liberal political ideologies to the space dream. The entire cosmology produced by NASA became a world reference, highly propagated to all corners of the globe, and these space dreams cradled the childhood dreams of billions of the world’s citizens. This NASA cosmology, built from the investment of several North Atlantic countries, was made possible by a large investment in the articulation between military and space science and technology and the use of cultural sectors such as education, media and arts (fine arts, design, cinema, documentary films, scifi literature, etc.). This articulation was fundamental to the construction of US cosmology and space culture from before the Apollos until the turn of the 2000s.

Today it seems that NASA is weakening as a national institution through the outsourcing of its work to the private sector, such as to companies like SpaceX and others, just as it begins to lose its hegemony to countries like China, which in turn is also investing heavily in the articulation between space science (military and civilian) and the cultural sectors (education, advertising, and art), thus building its own cosmology, its own version of the future of earthlings among the stars, based on its own space dreams. So when we talk about space culture, we are necessarily negotiating with hegemonic projects that drag along the research and industries of other countries, that seek to engage in the technologies already developed in order to be able to act in some way on the space scene, without being able to build structural differences in these hegemonies. But it is in this sense that we insist on acting with a research and production platform in the sector of space art and culture, because it has the capacity to produce social engagement, produce new proposals, build imaginaries, intervene in the homogenized symbolic universe.

Anthropocene of the Earth and Space

At a historic moment when humans are slowly realizing their form of production and consumption is exterminating the earth’s biodiversity, the use of resources is putting their existence at risk, and the international economic relations are far from bringing justice and social balance, space dreams gain another connotation. Celestial stars begin to be seen as a place of abundant resources. With this, scientific research accelerates its experiments and companies develop mechanisms to exploit the minerals, space law anticipate the problems arising from the use of these resources, medicine starts to do tests in microgravity to cure cancer and make genetic experiments, and food companies start to build their space planting projects. This is how part of the new world economy begins to migrate its interests to the solar system, what we have called in our meetings solar capitalism, which is the displacement of the same expansionist, colonial logic of exploitation and expropriation of resources to other planets. It is good to underline that we are not against human expansion towards the solar system, much less against human colonies or the use of extraterrestrial natural resources to potentiate terraforming on an interplanetary scale. The question is how we can interfere in the colonial logic so that it does not repeat its expansion in the same molds produced during European expansionism towards the Americas, which intends to promote without any shame a space feudalism or a solar plutocracy. It is at this point that art and space culture have much to contribute to break the structural hegemony of the new space projects, expanding the possibilities of occupation of the solar system in a creative, intuitive, imaginative and multidiverse way.

Produce difference and not only reproduce the same model in space art and culture

By adopting the vision of diversity, we are in a better position to think about transdisciplinarity. But this intersection between local diversity and astropolitical events is no easy task. We can speculate, for example, what this means when we think of the local complexities of the USA, Russia, China, Arab Emirates, India, the countries of Europe, Africa, Asia, Middle East, or right here in South America. Each one of these points disputes internal ideologies and carries in its baggage its own irreducibilities, its own historical traumas, its megalomaniac idiosyncrasies versus the history of the disempowered, its projects of power versus its religious fanaticisms, its crises of values and rights, and its local injustices. To confuse the production of diversity with a regionalist homogenization is a completely inconceivable idea. This is a naive utopia. Apparently the unique way to relate local diversities to the more neuralgic aspects of astropolitics and astroculture is to bet on historically effective skills of negotiation and diplomacy between various sectors of the society, in our case between varios sectores of space sciences and of art/culture, accessing creative spheres able to create and express, from practices such as transculturality e transdisciplinarity, what is most pulsating, controversial, complex, or even, disruptive or antagonistic to the massive domestication of our intelligence and our future. We have to act all the time in the interstices between space imaginaries and space hegemonies.

In this perspective, a series of art and space culture activities are being carried out at INPE from 2019 until now (end of 2022), which aims to advance in transdisciplinary research projects. This amalgam is capable of producing news cosmic thoughts in the country, which not only consumes but also generates technodiversity. We intend to use this series as a platform of reference to create a research core group in space art and culture.

Artistic residencies at PGETE/INPE and INPE & Society project – COEPE/DIEXC (2019-2022) (3)

The first activities we did at INPE were the artistic residencies. We advocated for artistic residencies at INPE for three reasons: 1) to create spaces for research in art and space culture; 2) construction of transdisciplinary fields between art and sciences; 3) expanding the spectrum of applicability of space technologies to other sectors of society.

The first resident artist of our platform SACI-E (Subjectivity, Art and Space Science) was the engineer, educator and artist Karina Karin (4) (11/2019), who developed the project “OriSat” (Ori: head in Yoruba – african Níger-Congo Language, Sat: Satellite), an afrofuturist satellite in cubesat format aimed at quilombola communities. Karina’s ArtSat makes reference to Afro-Brazilian ancestrality and to Afrofuturism as a cultural segment, its mission is food security and the care of soil, temperature and environment of the plantations in quilombola communities. The artsat is still in the building process, but it is being first tested at the State School Doutor Rodolfo Siqueira, from the City Hall of São Gonçalo / RJ, where Karina develops science education projects. The residency was under the care of PGETE/INPE, curated by the author of this text and supervised by Dr. Walter Abrahão dos Santos.

In February of 2020 was the turn of the artist Pitter Rocha (5) (UNIRIO) to go to the SACI-E art-residency, also an Afrofuturist artist, who sonified the CBERS 04A data. The CBERS (China-Brazil Earth Resources Satellite) program was implemented in 1988 through a partnership between the National Institute for Space Research (INPE) and the Chinese Academy of Space Technology (CAST), in a binational technical and scientific agreement involving Brazil and China. The CBERS 04A satellite is an Earth observation satellite, the result of a Sino-Brazilian agreement launched on December 20, 2019, is the successor to CBERS-4, launched on December 7, 2014. Resident artist Pitter Rocha was the first artist to operate with the CBERS 04A data, a month after its launch, turning it into a musical document. The presentation of his work were demonstrated in the lectures of the 1st Workshop of ArtSat of INPE (6). The residency was also under the care of PGETE/INPE, curated by the author of this text and supervised by Dr. Walter Abrahão.

The third artist in residency at SACI-E was Zander Porter (7). In March 2022, the artist, choreographer and performer from Amsterdam University of the Arts (DAS Choreography) performed his work under the title “3MOT1NG”, also known as somatic cyborg. The work consists of the translation in the form of gestures and choreographed movements, the affections that the encounter between human and technology arouse, the artist transforms the strangeness and human subjugation to the machine, into performance. Zander’s artistic work at INPE was to conduct an experiment in the architecture of the anechoic chambers of the LIT (Test and Integration Laboratory), proposing to transform his body into a satellite under test, deflagrating the solitude of this body in a hostile and machinary environment. Accustomed to working in groups, the artist put himself to the test by investigating alone the extremely silent environment of the cameras and with live video recordings built the structure of his choreography. It was the first residency done under the care of COEPE and DIEXC/INPE, curated by the author of this text and supervised by Dr. Paulo Escada.

In our analysis, the residencies showed positive results, because despite being experimental and with no financial support from INPE, the institution provided support for receiving the artists and making available equipment and laboratories, as well as academic supervision for the researchers artists, who were able to produce works related to INPE’s space science program. The two first residencies were produced by the Space Engineering and Technology sector, and the third was produced buy INPE & Society (COEPE/DIEXC) but many other areas are willing to receive research artists, such as the astrophysics sector, advanced mathematics, remote sensing, terrestrial systems, among others. The goal is to expand the area of access for artist-in-residencies in the future. Some more artistic residencies were planned for 2022 and 2023, however, due to the pandemic the process was more restricted and slow.

ArtSat, Space Art, nanosatellite, space junk, (research in our greatest tool)

There is a great fear in relation to small satellites because of their durability and the ease with which they become space junk. Furthermore, the large undertakings in this area are being made by megacorporations that launch constellations of small satellites at once, thus changing the orbital traffic and dominating its use. When we join the small satellite project, we do so because this technology democratizes orbital use for developing countries that are not able to compete with the production of large scale satellites. Small satellites facilitate access to space science and technology, disseminate knowledge, and involve space engineering sectors with other fields of knowledge. Universities, schools, institutions and companies in the countries of the global south have shown increasing interest in small satellites in recent years. This is due to the accessibility and cheapening of resources. When we defend the creation of small artistic satellites (ArtSats), we do it in the name of access to research and at the same time, to guarantee representativeness and legitimacy in the space sector. The issue of space junk must be seen as a problem of the satellite components, which must be increasingly natural and less harmful, and for the treatment of waste, nowadays there are a number of efficient projects that aim to strongly reduce the space junk produced by the space industry, but still with little investment. These projects need to have more financial support to be properly tested and finally used. In order to work exactly in the interstices of these problems, we have opened the ArtSat programs, as a field of research and action in this sense.

But what is an ArtSat? ArtSat is an abbreviation for Satellite Art (8). It is an artifact that combines satellite engineering with artistic techniques. The quality of an ArtSat is related to the utility of its payload, but also to its materiality, the nature of its components, and its form. Beyond the requirements of space engineering, the characteristics of an ArtSat also manifest themselves in its poetic attributes. An ArtSat is the materialization of a “hybrid language” that articulates technoscience with the sensitive dimension in the same object, besides being an instrument of investigation, research and deepening technoscientific, artistic and cultural knowledge, as exemplified by Karina Karim’s OriSat satellite, whose mission, as mentioned above, is to operate with food security in quilombola communities, joining aesthetic and conceptual aspects of Afrofuturism and at the same time determining a social utility to the object.

Every satellite has a mission. So does an ArtSat. An ArtSat’s missions aggregate content that concerns also to the fictional and speculative dimensions, which has the power to affect sensibilities and futures. It is in our interest to open spaces for the creation of satellites whose mission is driven by afrofuturistic, ecological, indigenous, handcrafted proposals, that is, we want to potentiate the construction of satellites that don’t exist or have even been imagined. ArtSats are technical devices whose aesthetic freedom promotes other problems and challenges for space engineering, which can leverage research in the area in ways not yet foreseen. This allows us to broaden the panorama about the new Space Race that emerges in contemporaneity, urging us to build a proper place for space occupation. In other words, it allows us to create concrete tools of action to deal with the great problems of our time related to the terrestrial, atmospheric and space environment, phenomena inherent to satellite technology research, without, however, abandoning the symbolic and futuristic production, which are generators of new worlds.

ArtSat Category in the CubeDesign (9)

CubeDesign is an annual event organized since 2018 by INPE’s Postgraduate Program in Space Engineering and Technology (PGETE). The initiative brings society closer to the development of small satellites in a competitive environment. In 2018 and 2019 participants from several institutions from different Latin American countries participated in the competition to perform all the tests required to launch a small satellite into space: environmental test, environmental pressure, thermal variation, voltage, battery temperature, vibration, random test, telemetry, suitability check, mission, communication, remote control, mechanism, battery conditioning, altitude determination, stabilization system, imaging, etc. The three categories in 2018 and 2019 were CubeSat, CanSat, Mockup. In 2020 and 2021, due to the pandemic, the competition was virtual, and even with restricted access to satellite testing, was successfully launched in 2021 the Data Science and ArtSat category (10).

In 2021 we launched for the first time the open call for the ArtSat (11) category, obtaining the participation of two competing teams: the team “Book of life” (transdisciplinary group created by the participants of II Workshop of ArtSat/2020), and the team “The shape in Space” of the State School Humberto de Campos of Sorocaba. For orientation, analysis and decision about the score of each team, we formed an advisor team with artists and engineers: Juan Diaz Infante (Ulysses I Satellite / Mexico), Lucas Bambozzi (Art and Technology / FAAP / Brazil), Mariana Paredes (Kosmica Institute / Mexico), Bruno Vianna (Brazilian from the Academy of Fine Arts / University of the Arts Helsinski (FI), Italo Pinto Rodrigues (Space Engineering / INPE / Brazil), Gabriela Junqueira (Space Engineering / INPE). The participants submitted their project files and after two weeks made the oral presentation of the project to the advisors (22/11/2021). They had 10 more days to deliver the reworked projects. Both teams were able to develop their project materially, the second place team “The Shape in Space ” launched their experiment with an atmospheric balloon a few days after the end of the competition in December 2021. The first place team “The Book of Life” is launching their experiment in orbit via SpaceX in late 2022, supported by the Mercosul Biennial. But the satellite changed its name, it is now called “Orbital Temple”. Its mission is to ask for names of dead people who have to be in heaven – “Who shall enter heaven? You tell me”. Orbital Temple is the first orbital satellite from the Global South with an artistic mission.

Both teams made an interesting ArtSat project. They not only managed to resolve the demands of an ArtSat competition, but were also able to build their own strategies to launch their space artifacts.

The awarding and closing ceremony of CubeDesign / 2021 was held with all the teams from all categories and had the (virtual) presence of coordinators from INPE and other institutions, as well as technology companies and supporters. In total there were about 150 participants, 18 of which were ArtSat teams. The participants of the competition were from several states in Brazil and many countries in Latin America. The video of the awards can be seen on CubeDesign’s youtube channel (12).

We consider the competition of high quality due to the generosity of the CubeDesign organization team, the attention given to the ArtSat category, the quality of the ArtSat’s works, and the performance of the advisor’s group. Our intention is to maintain the ArtSat category in this competition for the next years.

Workshops of ArtSat (PGETE/INPE – 2020/2021)

ArtSat as a new category of CubeDesign has opened a new demand for our space art and culture program: to build an ArtSat development workshop, even to guarantee that there will be Brazilian participation in CubeDesign competitions and other satellite competitions. But it is not only about teaching how to build a technical object in the form of an artistic satellite. It is also about creating a conceptual work that enlarges the cultural spectrum that involves the artifact, giving conditions for a wide range of possibilities, based on global historical references, geopolitical and astropolitical discussions related to both art and space science, fomenting debates about space law, contemporary art, international circuit of art and technology, economic systems behind satellite technology, and so on. We apply the criteria developed in our curatorial line to make critical, political, ethical, ecological, philosophical and aesthetic thinking flourish. Our mission is to further the flourishing of transdisciplinary languages, to enhance the creativity of the workshops by bringing in experienced guests to talk about their projects, coordinators of space science institutes, curators from various countries, organizers of art and technology festivals, and artists who have already sent works into space.

The II Workshop of ArtSat / 2020 encouraged greater participation from the Latin American public. The reason is obvious: We share similar interests and difficulties. It serves as a socio-technological investment in regional Space Culture, which seeks above all to bring together the common interests of various groups from different countries in order to foster the production of a singular space art-science, which does not submit indiscriminately to the polarizing discourses of the great space programs, or the great Art and Science programs, which centralize financial and media resources overshadowing the initiatives of developing countries. If we enter the new Space Race bringing with freedom a Latin, tropical space culture, producing the equatorial perspectivist technodiversity, won’t we be contributing more effectively to the international community? In other words, there are discursive and technological components that are unique and non-transferable from their local value, that can be of great value to the world. However, conditions must be created to facilitate these characteristics to appear.

Latin America needs to develop research, technoscientific production and a singular space art/culture, that express its geopolitical condition, with its emerging, indigenized, africanized, miscegenated countries, to be capable of creating from its own complexity. The Workshops of ArtSat have a mission to encourage technodiversity. This represents an advance for the thought and production of Latin American art and science, because we want to cooperate in the formation of people that understands the place that Latin American countries occupy in contemporary astropolitics and should occupy in the next steps of the new space race.

Workshop of ArtSat at INPE / 2020 (13)

The I Workshop of ArtSat at INPE was a 40 hours course focused on art and space culture, organized as follows: 1) workshop for building satellites (ArtSat), executed by the electronic engineer Lázaro Camargo, and 2) presentation of artistic and theoretical works about the art/space science theme, curated by the author of this text, which had the participation of Italo Pinto Rodrigues representing CubeDesign. It had about thirty-five presentations of artistic and scientific research with guests from various places of Brazil and the world (14). In the end four teams were formed (15): 1) Team Antigenik Lab y Navalha Sat by Urutau Maria Pinto y “Antigenik Lab”, 2) Team Caipora-Sat by Alejandra Carolina Labarca Puelles, Ada Grecia Arenas sanchez and Yeté Abunã Marques Labarca, 3) Team ART. Rocket / SOLARSCAPES by Carolina Mattos Schundt, Ricardo Palmieri and Victor Valentim, 4) Team Inumeráveis / Livro da Vida – a memorial pocketQube – by Edson Pavoni, Pedro Kaled and Roberta Savian. The latter participated in the CubeDesign competition in the ArtSat category and took first place, and now in September 2022 launches its ArtSat into space, through Space X.

Workshop of ArtSat at INPE / 2021 (16)

The II Workshop of ArtSat at INPE, as the first workshop, was a 40-hour course focused on space art and culture, organized as follows: 1) workshop for the construction of satellites (ArtSat), executed by the electronic engineer Lázaro Camargo and 2) Presentation of artistic and theoretical works on the theme of art/space science, under the curatorship of the author of this text, which had about 10 theoretical debates (17) from the Latin American perspective, with guest speakers from countries such as Mexico, Ecuador, Colombia, Chile, Bolivia and from Brazilian states such as Amazonas, Pará, Rio Grande do Norte and São Paulo. 3) An open call for the creation of an album of space music, made only for Latin American musicians. In the end a single cross-disciplinary team with 10 members called ARATUSAT. Aratu means a mangrove crab, which is used in the project as a reference to the manguebit movement that brings together Pernambuco’s regional culture with electronic music, plus aspects critical to globalization. ArtSat’s mission is to create a model for reading space debris and transform them into artistic readings, but with the data released. The team consists of 10 members: Arad Walsh, Enzo Garabito, Fernanda Neves, Isabella Fernanda, Lino Divas, Luciana de Paula Santos, Núbia de Moura Borges, Pitter Gabriel Maciel Rocha, Sidney Monteiro Jr. For those who want to get to know the project, access the SACI-E website (18).

First Album of Latin American Cosmic Sounds (19)

We took advantage of the structure of the II ArtSat Workshop at INPE to launch an open call for the creation of the First Album of Latin American Cosmic Sounds. It was focused entirely on Latin American musical artists. The main theme of the album was “Latin America in the future of space occupations”. The theme gave us the opportunity to contribute to the construction of an imaginary spatial sound repertoire, gathering practices and poetics that represent the diversity of sound production and the local specificities of some Latin American countries. Compositions that explore the relationship between scientific data and sonification were considered in the Album. This data could be extracted from artifacts such as satellites, probes, antennas, telescopes, remote sensing techniques or other space equipment from any country, or from previously produced sound materials. Data and image sonification, electromagnetic interferences, programming, computer engineering, circuit-bending, arduino, scores and graphic notations were used in the compositions. We emphasized that the sound proposal should relate technique, concept and poetics, articulating the material with the theme of the album and with the issues surrounding environmental and climate changes, atmospheric pollution and spatial occupation.

“The collection covers different practices and techniques of sound creation, such as electroacoustic and noise music, sound collage, field recording, different approaches to sonification of data and images, improvisation, creation of instruments to capture electromagnetic waves that are converted into sound. The set instigates by presenting a diverse aesthetic picture of sound speculations of the cosmos through the sound memory of space missions, records of electromagnetic manifestations, sonification of scientific data from space program archives, solar activity and rain flow. The compilation is a cosmic cross between art, science, technology, speculative fiction, and sound. This mix activates the listener’s cosmoperception to the vibrations of the invisible, the noise that runs through us. The cosmic sonorities are a journey where we embark on a nomadic experience through space enveloped by one of the engines. They make us feel the warmth of the electromagnetic waves of solar winds in the glowing sunset, which burn away the remnants of the expanded voices of human experience. The sidereal sonic experience is a continuum from the silence of the vacuum to the subtle vibration of the meteor, the life force, the axé of the celestial body. It relays, re-reads, revises, reactivates the imagery and imagination of the dimensions and forces of Space; it sonifies the vision of science and allows us to read images in their smallest parts, bits, pixels and frames, creating movement. Thus, we dance solar data in Afro-indigenous Atlantic beats and revisit the first science, the science of rhythm, the one that shapes time. The effect of time is fluid, it dilates and contracts, flows like the waters in 100 years within 3 minutes. Sound, as the ontology of a world, allows us to touch the invisible, greet the sub-atomic, and echo into eternity, aligned with the stars, undead satellites, and alien nature (20).

For the realization of the album we invited the brazilian artist, musician and second artistic resident of INPE, Pitter Rocha, to share the curatorship with the author of this text, and the Argentinean artist Lino Divas to do the graphic design. The album Latin American Cosmic Sonorities brings together 13 sound compositions by 19 artist-scientists from 6 countries (Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, and Uruguay). Its purpose was to deflate the Latin American imaginary about the cosmos, thus constituting a spatial sound occupation allied to the multiplicity of cultures and musical styles of this group of countries. The selection was made through an open call, with the following provocations: What is the role of Latin America in Space Occupations? What contribution can it make to global space thinking from its specific singularity? The album is the result of these provocations. The tracks were chosen through curation and two guest jurors: Tatiana Cuoco (Argentina) and María Ignacia Edwards (Chile).

List of artists and the songs of the Album of Latin American Cosmic Sounds
1 – SPACE NOMADS – Jorge Barco (CO) – 6’18”
2- Ocaso – Telmo Cristovam (BR) – 6”
3- Cosmic Scraps – Ariane Stolfi (BR) – 6’30”
4 – Sideral – Gilberto Esparza and Marcela Armas in collaboration with Diego Liedo and Daniel Llermaly (MX) – 6’5”
5 – re:transmission – Henrique Roscoe (BR) – 6’38”’
6 – Solar Wave – A1219 and Flávia Goa (BR) – 2021, 4’20”
7 – Pluvia (Meditation about Precipitation and Temperature Brazilian Data Sonification from 1901 – 2020 ) – Viktor Stargazer (BR) – 3’42”
8 – Tocando Lo Invisible – Isaac Medina y Mariana Paredes (MX) – 4’2”
9 – Bön – Fill (AR) – 4’30”’
10 – Diamagnetism – Bella (BR) – 6’21”’
11 – Jupiter Saturn conjunction through the waves emitted by a zombie satellite – Brian Mackern (UY) – 8’21”’
12 – Moon in Juno – Pedro Diaz and Alexandre Beraldo (BR) – 6’27”
13 – Naturaleza Alien Homocosmicusfungi – José Luis Jácome Guerrero (EC) – 10’36”’

Plutocracy on Pluto, summer course focused on astropolitics (21)

Plutocracy is a system of government where only the wealthy have the legal right to exercise political control. It is a regime where the class that dominates the means of production, circulation, and distribution of wealth is the same class that determines the fate of the earthly populations. An example of this is the operating model of the technology corporations known as Big Techs, which spread across all continents of the planet determining social relations and using as capital, user data on a global level. When we talk about Plutocracy on Pluto we are making a double provocation, which is to question the forms of power and control on Earth and also in Space. We ask ourselves whether the worldviews that are at stake in the New Space Race, with all its projects for military weaponry, production of space technology, artificial intelligence and mining of celestial bodies (such as the Moon, Mars and asteroids) will serve only to empower the plutocracy from the acceleration of the modes of domination of the solar system by a few corporate conglomerates, or whether we are facing a new possibility of creating a future that will also allow the transportation of the multiplicity of world views, different perspectives of the world and biodiversity that characterizes, in principle, the planet Earth. In other words, through this new space opportunity, will collaboration between peoples be more determining than competition between large corporations, or are we only reinforcing with more sophisticated models the hierarchy and discrepancy between rich and poor peoples? Plutocracy on Pluto was a course in astropolitics, geopolitical positioning, that helped us map out the interests behind current space projects, be they military, industrial, commercial, or scientific. It is also a study of the imaginaries that cross this new frontier. We want to zoom in on the utopias, dystopias, philosophical, speculative, artistic imaginaries, and on the science fictions that have been produced by means of this space dilemma, to better visualize the aesthetics of the future that are being produced in this context of climate change and space occupation.

Plutocracy on Pluto was a geopolitics course focused on space issues. It was held from January 24 to 28, 2022, in a virtual form, with intensive meetings in the mornings and afternoons. The course dealt with political issues, economic and legal multilateral interests of the state and private sectors that configure the “new space”. From the perspective of art and space culture, topics such as colonies on the Moon and Mars, mining the celestial stars, utopias and dystopias of space programs, and the subjective constructs that accompany such themes were addressed. Futuristic and aesthetic imaginaries were brought through the point of view of curators, philosophers, entrepreneurs, artists, scientists, natives, astronomers, engineers, and others. We consider the knowledge of geopolitics to be extremely important for training in the sectors of space art and culture, so that students can understand space projects in depth and be able to evaluate the forces at play in the current process of expansion towards the solar system. In all, there were 18 specialists in the fields of space art, science, and technology, with about 90 students enrolled. We consider the course to be excellent because of its boldness and creativity. Working with such complex themes as space geopolitics in a transdisciplinary way and with the bias of the great philosophical sets that guide the space art and culture places this course in the international state of the art. The quality of the lectures, the multiculturalism of the speakers, the perspective of the global south in the face of the whole New Space scene, the depth with which the themes were discussed and the attention given by the registrants makes us consider the course worthy of continuation.

Conclusion

In terms of comparison with other international space programs, we deduce that the four projects developed at INPE so far are in line with the state of the art in the area of space art and culture. We consider this projects innovative and excellent in terms of results, shared technologies and conceputalization. The projects are complying with the curatorial line to which we propose ourselves that seeks originality, authenticity and cultural diversity. Para comprovar isso, usamos como exemplo os trabalhos finais das oficinas ArtSats, que, além de serem feitas por meio de equipes transdisciplinares que se organizam dentro da própria oficina, trazem em sua missão, propostas que condizem com a linha curatorial do nosso programa, como como o CaiporaSat/2020, que como projeto pretende trabalhar com sensoriamento remoto em regiões de reservas indígenas, ou o NavalhaSat/2020, que apesar de ainda não ter desenvolvido totalmente o satélite, tem uma equipe formada apenas por travestis, ou o AratuSat/2021 que é baseado no ancestrofuturismo (ancestralidade e imaginações futurísticas) trazendo como missão do ArtSat registrar dados e imagens de lixo espacial da baixa órbita terrestre (LEO – Low Earth Orbit) para produzir trabalhos com esses dados de arte e exibi-los, realizando assim apropriações e reconfigurações, na tentativa de sensibilizar e aproximar as pessoas de uma questão tão urgente que é o lixo espacial. With these few examples we can verify that there is a correspondence between the curatorial interests and the production of ArtSats, and this means that we are opening a significant transdisciplinary line.

Finally, we emphasize that the developed projects can be replicated and deepened to the extent that they have more institutional support both in terms of internal and external recognition of INPE, which can only happen through dissemination, translation, publication and exchanges. In 2022 and 2023, both the ArtSat Workshop, the summer course and the record production could be part of the Space Studies Program (SSP) of the International Space University (ISU), which may come to be held in Brazil under the coordination of INPE, the Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (ITA) and the Prefeitura de São José dos Campos. It is also possible to be presented in international meetings such as the ITACCUS / IAF (Committee for the Cultural Utilization of Space of the International Astronautical Federation), besides being possible to start a series of exchanges with research centers in art and space culture in countries of Europe, North America, India, Russia and China, research centers in Latin America and countries of the Global South.

BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES

ANTUNES, Eduardo Vichi. “A Evolução Histórica do Programa Espacial Brasileiro”. Anais Eletrônicos do 15º Seminário Nacional de História da Ciência e da Tecnologia, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, 16 a 18 de novembro de 2016.
BORGES, Fabiane M. “Na busca da cultura espacial” (tese de doutorado). PUC/SP, 2013;
BORGES, Fabiane M. Extremophilia ou 6º número da revista Das Questões, UNB/DF, 2018;
BORGES, Fabiane M. “Arte Espacial – Cultura Espacial – Artes e Ciências Espaciais”, Ed. Circuito. UFRJ/RJ, 2017.
BUREAUD, Annick. A beautiful name for a satellite*Satellites artistiques. Objets d’art paradoxaux, entre politique et poétique. Revista Das Questões n#6, Setembro/Dezembro 2018. Dossie Extremophilia. Organização Fabiane M. Borges.
BURGESS, Lowry; GOODS, Dan; HAWWKINS, Isabel; LISOWSKY, Lorelei; PIETRONIGRO Frank. “The Arts and Space Culture: The Common Ground of Creativity”. Zero Gravity Arts Consortium, 12/2005
BUTTLER, E. Octavia. “Lilith’s Brood” Complete Xenogenesis.. Ed. Grand Central Publishing. EUA, 2000
CASTRO, Eduardo Viveiros de. Os pronomes cosmológicos e o perspectivismo ameríndio. Mana [online]. 1996, vol.2, n.2.
China National Space Administration – “China’s Space Program: A 2021 Perspective” – The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China / Date：2022-01-28
DEAN. D. James; ULRICH, Bertram. (Smithsonian Institution; Traveling Exhibition Service; National Air and Space Museum; National Aeronautics and Space Administration EUA) ” NASA/art : 50 years of exploration”. Ed. New York: Abrams: in association with NASA and Smithsonian Institution, 2008
DELEUZE, G. (1969/1982) A lógica do sentido. São Paulo: Perspectiva.
DOMINGUES, Diana. “A Arte no Século XXI – A Humanização das Tecnologias” – Ed. UNESP. São Paulo, 1997. “Sky Art Conference-86”, que conectou via slow scan o Center for Advanced Visual Studies, do Massachusetts Institute of Technology (CAVS) e artistas de São Paulo, através da ECA-USP.
GALEANO, Eduardo. Las Venas Abiertas de América Latina. 52º Edición. Siglo Veintiuno Argentina Editores Ediciones. 1988.
GEPPERT, Alexander C.T. Imagining Outer Space: European Astroculture in the Twentieth Century. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
GEPPERT, Alexander C. T. “Flights of Fancy: Outer Space and the European Imagination, 1927-1969”. In: Societal Impact of Spaceflight (editores: Steven J. Dick e Roger D. Launius). EUA: NASA, 2007
GRIFFIN Joanna, “Moon Vehicle: Reflections from an Artist-Led Children’s Workshop on the Chandrayaan-A Spacecraft’s Mission to the Moon”, Leonardo, Vol45, n°3, pp. 219-224, 2012, Cambridge, MIT Press
GRIFFIN, Joanna. “Creative resistance and satellite imaginaries”- Revista Das Questões n#6, Setembro/Dezembro 2018. Dossiê Extremøphilia. Organização Fabiane M. Borges.
HARAWAY, Donna. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective – Source: Feminist Studies, Vol. 14, No. 3 (Autumn, 1988)
HAUPT, Tracee. “The NASA Art Program: Technology, Art, and Contested Visions of Progress, 1962-1973”; Quest – The history of Spaceflight – Quarterly – Volume 24 • Number 1 2017.
HUI, Yuk. The Question Concerning Technology in China – Essay in Cosmotechnics. Ed. Urbanomic, 2016.
KILGORE, Douglas De Witt. Astrofuturism: Science, Race, and Visions of Utopia in Space. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003
KILGORE, De Witt Douglas: “C/SETI as Fiction: On James Gunn’s The Listeners” do livro: “Societal Impact of Spaceflight” editado por Steven J. Dick and Roger D. Launius. NASA, Washington, Dc -2007
KULACKI, Gregory and LEWIS, Jeffrey G. (2009). A Place for One’s Mat: China’s Space Program, 1956–2003. Publicado pela American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
LAND, Nick. “Fanged Noumena” Collected Writings 1987-2007. Ed. Urbanomic. 3º Edition , UK. 2014
LEE Soo-jin, WOHN Kwang-yun, “The Media-Art Exhibition Ten YearsAfter-v4.0-OuterSpace”, Leonardo, Vol.41, n°5, pp. 454-459, 2008
MACHADO, Arlindo. Máquina e Imaginário, O desafio das Poéticas Tecnológicas. Texto: Máquina e Imaginário. Pág. 30. 3. ed. – São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo, 1º ed. 1993
MALINA Frank J., On the Visual Fine Arts in the Space Age, Leonardo,Vol.3, pp.323-325, 1970
MALINA Roger, “The Cultural Dimension of Space Exploration”, Editorial, Leonardo, Vol. 25, n°1, pp. 1-2, 1992, Oxford, Pergamon Press
MANN, Adam. What Is The Dream Of Chinese Spaceflight? Publicado no medium.com em 10/10/2017.https://medium.com/@adammann93...
FRENAIS, Rob La. and CHARDRONNET, “Ewen. Space Without Rockets”. 2022. UV. Edition.
ROLNIK, Suely. Esferas da Insurreição, notas para uma vida não cafetinada. Editora N-1, 2018. © n-1 edições, 2018.
ROTH Tim Otto, “Cosmic Revelation”, Leonardo, Vol.42, n°3, pp.288-289, 2009
ROTH Tim Otto, “From the Distant Past”, Leonardo, Vol. 46, n°5, pp. 492-493, MIT Press, 2013
SAGAN, Carl; SALZMAN, Sagan Linda; DRAKE, Frank. – “A Message from Earth” – Source: Science, New Series, Vol. 175, No. 4024 (Feb. 25, 1972), pp. 881-884 – Published by: American Association for the Advancement of Science
WOODS, Arthur. “Art to the Stars: An Astronautical Perspective on the Arts and Space”. Ars Astronautica, 11/2018. Disponível em: https://www.arsastronautica.co... stars.php

NOTES

1. Cfe. Galeano, Eduardo. Open Veins of Latin America. Translated by C. Belfrage, Monthly Review Press, 1996. Page 15 to 90 //// Original: Cfe. GALEANO, Eduardo. Las Venas Abiertas de América Latina. 52º Edición. Siglo Veintiuno Argentina Editores Ediciones. 1988.
2. Cfe. Haraway, Donna. (2009). Localized knowledges: the question of science for feminism and the privilege of the partial perspective. Cadernos Pagu, (5), 7-41. Retrieved from https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp... . Original article published in Feminist Studies, 13 (3), 1988, translated with the permission of Feminist Studies, Inc., c/o Women’s Studies Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. (…) “I am arguing for politics and epistemologies of allocation, positioning, and situation in which partiality rather than universality is the condition of being heard in the propositions to be made of rational knowledge. These are proposals regarding people’s lives; the view from a body, always a complex, contradictory, structuring and structured body, versus the view from above, from nowhere, of simplism. Only the trick of god is forbidden. Here is a criterion for deciding the question of science in militarism, this science/technology dream of perfect language, perfect communication, final order.” (…) “It seems clear that feminist versions of objectivity and embodiment-that is, of a world-of the kind outlined here require a deceptively simple maneuver within Western analytic traditions, a maneuver that began with dialectics but stopped before the necessary revisions. Localized knowledges require that the object of knowledge be seen as an actor and agent, not as a screen, or a terrain, or a resource, and finally never as a slave to the master who encloses the dialectic only in his agency and his authority of “objective” knowledge. The observation is paradigmatically clear in critical approaches to the social sciences and humanities, in which the very agency of the people studied transforms the entire project of social theory production.”
3. Departments of INPE (National Institute for Space Research): PGETE (Program Post-Graduation on space engineering and technology // COEPE (Coordination of Teaching, Research and Extension) and DIEXC (Extension and Training Division) – https://www.gov.br/inpe/pt-br
4. First artist in residence at INPE \ Karina Karim\ 2019 – Under academic supervision of Walter Abrahão dos Santos and curated by Fabiane M. Borges. (Accessed on 07/17/2022)
5. Second artist in residence at INPE \ Pitter Rocha \ 2020 – Under academic supervision of Walter Abrahão dos Santos and curated by Fabiane M. Borges. (Accessed on 07/17/2022)
6. Presentation of the results of Karina Karim and Pitter Rocha’s artistic residencies at INPE’s I ArtSat Workshop (Accessed on 07/17/2022)
7. Third artist in residence at INPE \ Zander Porter \ 2022 – Under academic supervision of Paulo Escada and curated by Fabiane M. Borges. (Accessed on 07/17/2022)
8. For more on artistic satellites and artsats, see the text by: Bureaud, Annick: A beautiful name for a satellite*Satellites artistiques. Objets d’art paradoxaux, entre politique et poétique. And Griffin, Joanna: Creative resistance and satellite imaginaries. Both articles are published in Das Questões Magazine n#6, September/December 2018. Dossier Extremøphilia. Organized by Fabiane M. Borges. (Accessed on 07/17/2022)
   
9. To see how a Cubedesign competition is organized at INPE, see the text “CubeDesign: A Comprehensive Competition for Space Engineering Training in Latin America”. By Walter A. Dos Santos, Jenny C. R. Asencio, Eduardo E. Burger, Lazaro A.P. Camargo, Christopher S. Cerqueira, Jeanne Lima, Herbi J. P. Moreira, Daniel Nono(1), Mateus Oliveira(1), Italo P. Rodrigues(1), Felipe O. Tavares, Auro Tikami, and Plinio I. G. Tenório. Or see event page. (All links were accessed in 09/07/2022).
10. To create the Artsat category we had to have a series of meetings with some members of the CubeDesign organization group like Ítalo Pinto Rodrigues, Ricardo Maurício Ferreira and André Ferreira Teixeira, under the guidance of Prof. Eng. Walter Abrahão dos Santos, to adapt the CubeSat evaluation criteria to ArtSat, decide the requirements for the ArtSat mission, define the tests and applications, as well as logos, social network calls, publications design, among others. http://www.inpe.br/cubedesign/...
11. Complete material for the CubeDesign 2021 ArtSat Category. Open call in Portuguese. Complete rules for the CubeDesign 2021 ArtSat Category- ArtSat Projects submitted for CubeDesign/ 2021: Book of Life & The Shape in Space. (All links were accessed on 07/17/2022)
12. The video of the awards can be seen on CubeDesign’s youtube channel (Accessed in 08/09/2022)
13. See open call: Portuguese – English. Call with the entire program of the ArtSat technical and theoretical course – with Lázaro Camargo and Fabiane M. Borges + guests Videos of the complete ArtSat technical course – with Lázaro Camargo. Videos of the complete theoretical course on Space Art and Culture – With Fabiane M. Borges + guests. (All links were accessed on 07/13/2022)
14. See First Workshop of ArtSat at INPE at SACI-E website. (accessed in 18/07/2022).
15. To see the teams of the ArtSats projects, access the SACI-E website. To access the complete material with all the schedule for the 1st INPE/2020 ArtSat Workshop. To access the contents of the lectures. (All links accessed on 07/18/2022)
16. Complete material with all the programming of the Second Workshop of ArtSat at INPE.
    Open call in Portuguese/Spanish. Open call at SACIE website – Program “Building an ArtSat” with Lázaro Camargo. Program of the Art/Space Culture Debates. (All links accessed 18/07/2022)
    
17. See the Second Workshop of ArtSat at INPE at SACI-E’s website. (accessed in 18/07/2022)
    
18. To learn more about the ArtSat ARATUSAT project, access the SACI-E website. (Accessed on 06/18/2022)
    
19. To access the “Latin American Cosmic Sonorities” Album, see the SACI-E website. /// To watch the release of the Album.
    (Links accessed on 07/18/2022) Organization: SACI-E/INPE. Curator and Organization: Fabiane M. Borges and Pitter Rocha Graphic Art: Lino Divas. Jurors: Tatiana Cuoco (Argentina) and María Ignacia Edwards (Chile), Realization: INPE (National Institute for Space Research); Support: DIVERSITAS/FFLCH/USP.
    
20. Cfe. Borges. Fabiane, M. and Rocha, Pitter. Curatorial text of the album “Latin American Cosmic Sonorities”. Check on SACI-E. (Accessed on 07/14/2022)
    
21. The videos of the lectures can be accessed on the SACI-E (Subjectivity, Art and Space Science) blog.
    Open call for Plutocracy on Pluto in Portuguese. In English. Schedule of the debates. (All links were accessed on 07/14/2022)

Disclaimer: This is the perspective adopted by researcher Fabiane M. Borges during the period in which she worked in the implementation of art and space culture projects at INPE, but this narrative is personal and does not represent the National Institute of Space Research or the current Federal Government of Brazil.